Skip to main content

Prioritizing: 5 Ways to Think About Tasks

One of the most challenging things in life is prioritizing. I find this is true for me particularly during the holidays and during the summer. There are so many things to do and see and just not enough time to do them. This is slightly different from time management in that time management is really the art of taking the time that you have allocated for a particular task or set of tasks and using techniques to ensure that this time is used for the tasks that you have decided on accomplishing.

For me, the problem isn't so much with time management. I've gotten better at that recently and I know how my body and mind work so I can handle that much of the time. Instead, the problem is more upstream -- prioritizing. I enjoy doing many different things throughout the day. I don't have ADD or ADHD or anything like that, but I really like switching gears often. I notice a significant reduction in my productivity if I have to do the same thing for more than 2-3 hours straight. I instead prefer to have 'organized chaos' with lots of little things going on all at the same time.

Rarely, I do find the need to focus - but this is rare. Most of the stuff I work on either in my job or at home is not too taxing and therefore doesn't require significant concentrated effort. But without further ado, here are my 5 tips for prioritizing quickly and easily:

-- Time: How much time is the task going to take? If it is a short task (less than 15 minutes, do it immediately. If you put it off, you will likely spend more time procrastinating than if you just did it.

-- Deadline: If there is a deadline to the task, particularly a monitary deadline, get it out of the way. In order to be certain that there is enough breathing room for these kinds of tasks, try to get these done a week ahead of time. Its not always possible, but if you get in this habit, you will notice that you are always ahead and therefore there is much less stress.

-- Iterations?: If this is a task that will require many meetings, (going back to the river, as it were), you need to determine your team or other people. If the people or person you're working with is notoriously late or changes his/her mind frequently, it is likely that you will want to put this on the back burner. On the other hand, if the task is something that will reduce work later on and will likely reduce overall iterations, then get it done soon.

-- Importance: Often times, things are very important, but they have no deadline or person clamoring for them. So, they get pushed off. Wills, Trusts, estate planning and retirement are the ones that spring to my mind. People think there's plenty of time and the only person getting hurt is them so they don't care. When something is important, you need to do it quickly. Sometimes, you might have to be late on other items if it is the only way to get to these things. Don't short change yourself or people you care about on items that are critical.

-- Flexibility: Are the requirements/deadlines/time constraints set in stone? If not, consider which tasks you might be able to push back on. It is often an 80-20 situation. If I can find that by pushing back on 1 of my tasks I can get 4 others done to meet the deadlines and constraints, that is a likely course of action.

so there's my five tips for thinking about tasks. Use them however you like, but you'll find that if you think about these ideas when it comes to deciding what needs to be done, you will have a much easier time setting your priorities.

Comments

zacharyfruhling said…
Dissertation or teaching responsibilities? Dissertation or teaching responsibilities? Dissertation or teaching responsibilities? hmmmm. Never seems to get any easier for me! hahaha!

Popular posts from this blog

On Buying a Lifestyle...with a Fixed-Rate Mortgage

Despite all of the back and forth about sub-prime mortgages and the housing bubble, I am feeling just fine. The reason is that when purchasing, I followed some old advice: Don't expect to flip. In general, I've been told by many people that you shouldn't buy a home unless you plan to hold on to it for 7 years or longer. If the market does well and you decide to sell, fine. But if you want to be sure not to lose money, don't buy something that you only want for a year or two. I've been in my current location for more than 3 years. I like it. And I have no intention of leaving in the short or medium term. It seems to me, that real estate, like any asset class, has its ups and downs. But as a practical point, I don't look at my home as an asset per se. Rather, I consider it to be a fixed expense that I need to survive, much like food and water. Therefore, as long as the payment is reasonable and it functions to keep me warm and sheltered and comfortable, that is a...

Do Better With Your Time

Recently, I've been extremely busy with some work commitments. The interesting thing for me is that this increased work activity has really helped crystallize some of my feelings with regard to time. And these ideas are a critical part about my view on personal finance. I'm curious to know if others feel similarly. Time is money. That is, Time, in some way, contains energy. Money, is also energy. In the act of working, I am able to compound and increase the amount of money that I have. I am exchanging my time and effort and thought which are components of my work, for the productivity that I produce. And this production gets me money from my employer. However, the first dollars that I make each day, week, or month are the most valuable. Then the ones that I make at the end are the most valuable. (Forget about taxes for a minute.) The reason is, the first ones help me have a place to live and food to eat. And the last ones are the ones that I can use to really improve my life lo...

Blogging WealthTrack: Christine Benz (Retire Early? Or not?)

 This morning I've watched an interesting video on Consuelo Mack: WealthTrack. Here, Consuelo's guest, a longtime contributor, Christine Benz, a personal finance expert from Morningstar joined Consuelo for a discussion on issues related to retirement, in particular in the current market environments. This conversation is even more interesting against the backdrop of The Great Resignation. I found Christine's advice to be particularly interesting on a couple of fronts. Her advice in dealing with talking about retirement in general, in particular for people who are in the process of thinking about retiring early gave me pause. She is considering the traditional advice of a 4 percent withdrawal rate to be dangerous and indeed, actually concerning. According to the recent research she cites, a 3% withdrawal rate is a better option. Even more than the four percent rule, I think that her comments on annuities are particularly interesting. While annuities have been given a bad nam...