Skip to main content

My Call Options Experience explained Simply

 So in my previous post, I detailed that I had started to experiment with Options Trading. None of this is advice, but just a description of my experience and thinking. I think that this was an interesting part of my experience in the past year because I didn't previously understand the appeal of some of the more complicated parts of the financial system despite being interested in it for a very long time. 

In the past few months, I've begun to take additional opportunities when I can with the shares that I own free and clear via covered calls. I've heard about this option more and I encourage people to read about it more if they are interested. However, this strategy works well for me. In my case, I own a large number of shares in my trading account of certain stocks or ETFs. 

It is my intention to buy more if we ever see a market drop. That said, I certainly don't intend to sell. Even in a crazy, 80% style drop like the great depression. I'm holding to zero. It's an extreme point of view. But for what I am going to describe, that is the standpoint where I think it makes sense.

Put simply, if I have 100 shares of stock ABC, and it is priced at 50 bucks, you might be willing to buy the right to get those shares at a higher price in the future, say 55 bucks within the next 30 days. What does this mean? It would be valuable for you if you managed money and you were believing that the stock would be going down. Why? Well, if your primary bet was that ABC sucked and it would tank, then you might be shorting it. In that case, you borrowed the stock and sold it at 50. You're betting it goes down, say to 45 and you can buy it back cheap and pocket the difference, 5 bucks a share.

What happens for sophisticated traders though, is that they sometimes see value in having insurance. In the scenario above, on ABC, they might want to minimize the downside. What if instead of going down as the other person thinks? Instead ABC spikes to 60. Now that person is hosed. They get called and have to pay 60 bucks a share, losing 10 bucks on each share.

Here's where the call comes in: They're sophisticated and know that sometimes things happen that are not as expected. So, they buy a call at 55. That means, in the bad case where it goes to 60, they still owe the difference, but they can recoup some of that by getting the shares from me at 55 instead of 60. A five dollar discount. Not bad right?

This is a great form of insurance for the other guy, but I'm giving something up here. Now, as a result of this, I lose all of the upside over 55 bucks. Why? Well, now he has the option to buy from me at this fixed price. So, for that option, I'm charging. Maybe 50 cents a share, maybe 2 bucks, or anything in between. Depending on the timeframe, the volatility of the stock and other factors, there is a market for these options.

What I like about this strategy though is simple: I'm not selling. And if you end up getting the stock from me at a higher price (we're selling calls that I have the shares for), then I still made some money: the fee of the option and the difference between the 50 and 55 in the example above. So, for options trading, I like this a fair bit. Of course, if the option is exercised, I'll sell my shares at that profit and I'm fine with it.

It's not the crazy you-only-live-once betting. Its just a few bucks usually. But, on a recurring basis, this can add up and I'm happy to get "paid to wait" while the stocks keep moving around while I have no intention of selling. If you're interested in options, I recommend you review educational materials, my broker provided some good information. It can really help make more sense of it. Have fun!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Buying a Lifestyle...with a Fixed-Rate Mortgage

Despite all of the back and forth about sub-prime mortgages and the housing bubble, I am feeling just fine. The reason is that when purchasing, I followed some old advice: Don't expect to flip. In general, I've been told by many people that you shouldn't buy a home unless you plan to hold on to it for 7 years or longer. If the market does well and you decide to sell, fine. But if you want to be sure not to lose money, don't buy something that you only want for a year or two. I've been in my current location for more than 3 years. I like it. And I have no intention of leaving in the short or medium term. It seems to me, that real estate, like any asset class, has its ups and downs. But as a practical point, I don't look at my home as an asset per se. Rather, I consider it to be a fixed expense that I need to survive, much like food and water. Therefore, as long as the payment is reasonable and it functions to keep me warm and sheltered and comfortable, that is a...

Do Better With Your Time

Recently, I've been extremely busy with some work commitments. The interesting thing for me is that this increased work activity has really helped crystallize some of my feelings with regard to time. And these ideas are a critical part about my view on personal finance. I'm curious to know if others feel similarly. Time is money. That is, Time, in some way, contains energy. Money, is also energy. In the act of working, I am able to compound and increase the amount of money that I have. I am exchanging my time and effort and thought which are components of my work, for the productivity that I produce. And this production gets me money from my employer. However, the first dollars that I make each day, week, or month are the most valuable. Then the ones that I make at the end are the most valuable. (Forget about taxes for a minute.) The reason is, the first ones help me have a place to live and food to eat. And the last ones are the ones that I can use to really improve my life lo...

Blogging WealthTrack: Christine Benz (Retire Early? Or not?)

 This morning I've watched an interesting video on Consuelo Mack: WealthTrack. Here, Consuelo's guest, a longtime contributor, Christine Benz, a personal finance expert from Morningstar joined Consuelo for a discussion on issues related to retirement, in particular in the current market environments. This conversation is even more interesting against the backdrop of The Great Resignation. I found Christine's advice to be particularly interesting on a couple of fronts. Her advice in dealing with talking about retirement in general, in particular for people who are in the process of thinking about retiring early gave me pause. She is considering the traditional advice of a 4 percent withdrawal rate to be dangerous and indeed, actually concerning. According to the recent research she cites, a 3% withdrawal rate is a better option. Even more than the four percent rule, I think that her comments on annuities are particularly interesting. While annuities have been given a bad nam...