Skip to main content

Evening out the inequalities, Separating the assets

This is the third post in a series of posts about divorce, covering a variety of topics and including a series of advice which in hindsight seems obvious, but before going through the process, seems very essential.

In deciding what the best way to even the equalities out, I found that I needed to decide first where my feelings were about the other person. In my case, the soon-to-be ex still held a place in my heart, something which has undoubtedly diminished over time. But at the moment in time when the decisions of divorce are taking place it is impossible to know the future. So, I would strongly recommend that you consider your feelings toward this other person and other people affected.

Separately, you should examine any morals or principles that you have to honor when you are going through the process. For me, I shared everything, I literally wanted to give my whole life to someone else. And that was something that I cannot even begin to explain in words, so this moral idea seemed no big shock to me; because it was an additional layer of treating others the way I want to be treated. I always knew that I needed to treat others better than I was being treated; this was how I thought about the world.

Once you have a grasp of your morals, principles, and feelings, you can really begin to go through the process of evaluating assets. For me this was quite simple: all assets are either owned already OR are some future income stream (like income expected from working). In court, frequently people talk about spousal support/alimony/etc and I find that this is something that is painful and difficult. I didn't want to be involved in anything that left a tether between me and my ex. For you to move on emotionally, separation and space are important catalysts along with time for emotions and issues to be ironed out.

In my case, I divided the assets we had by value and understood what was the most valuable for each of us. Considering the likely lifestyle going forward, it became easy to manage the process around dividing the existing assets. Some people have large amounts of equity in real estate. These kinds of situations are very difficult because they often require the sale of the real estate to free up the capital. In my case I was able to offset retirement account balances against real estate to be able to proceed forward with minimal effort.

In terms of ongoing payments against future income, like Alimony or Spousal support, I would strongly recommend that the money be paid in full up front rather than over time. The biggest factor in this kind of decision is ability to pay, but in the case of up front payments, this avoids creating a debt into the future which is an additional burden to carry from the divorce which is unadvisable in my opinion.

The biggest aspect of the divorce from the legal standpoint is the division of property, but for survival, it can often be emotional health and well-being. To maintain emotional health, it is important to make the asset separtion efficient. Going back and reviewing this multiple times is not usually helpful; a simple spreadsheet will do. And avoiding ongoing payments of any kind is a good option in my experience.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Buying a Lifestyle...with a Fixed-Rate Mortgage

Despite all of the back and forth about sub-prime mortgages and the housing bubble, I am feeling just fine. The reason is that when purchasing, I followed some old advice: Don't expect to flip. In general, I've been told by many people that you shouldn't buy a home unless you plan to hold on to it for 7 years or longer. If the market does well and you decide to sell, fine. But if you want to be sure not to lose money, don't buy something that you only want for a year or two. I've been in my current location for more than 3 years. I like it. And I have no intention of leaving in the short or medium term. It seems to me, that real estate, like any asset class, has its ups and downs. But as a practical point, I don't look at my home as an asset per se. Rather, I consider it to be a fixed expense that I need to survive, much like food and water. Therefore, as long as the payment is reasonable and it functions to keep me warm and sheltered and comfortable, that is a...

Do Better With Your Time

Recently, I've been extremely busy with some work commitments. The interesting thing for me is that this increased work activity has really helped crystallize some of my feelings with regard to time. And these ideas are a critical part about my view on personal finance. I'm curious to know if others feel similarly. Time is money. That is, Time, in some way, contains energy. Money, is also energy. In the act of working, I am able to compound and increase the amount of money that I have. I am exchanging my time and effort and thought which are components of my work, for the productivity that I produce. And this production gets me money from my employer. However, the first dollars that I make each day, week, or month are the most valuable. Then the ones that I make at the end are the most valuable. (Forget about taxes for a minute.) The reason is, the first ones help me have a place to live and food to eat. And the last ones are the ones that I can use to really improve my life lo...

Blogging WealthTrack: Christine Benz (Retire Early? Or not?)

 This morning I've watched an interesting video on Consuelo Mack: WealthTrack. Here, Consuelo's guest, a longtime contributor, Christine Benz, a personal finance expert from Morningstar joined Consuelo for a discussion on issues related to retirement, in particular in the current market environments. This conversation is even more interesting against the backdrop of The Great Resignation. I found Christine's advice to be particularly interesting on a couple of fronts. Her advice in dealing with talking about retirement in general, in particular for people who are in the process of thinking about retiring early gave me pause. She is considering the traditional advice of a 4 percent withdrawal rate to be dangerous and indeed, actually concerning. According to the recent research she cites, a 3% withdrawal rate is a better option. Even more than the four percent rule, I think that her comments on annuities are particularly interesting. While annuities have been given a bad nam...