Skip to main content

Core Inflation results in Overinflated Ideas

One of my pet peeves lately is the idea that the economy is doing so great because of the low inflation rate. Core Inflation is hovering around 2.2 percent and that is being heralded as great news with regard to the overall economy.

The problem, as I see it though, is that the inflation that I feel in my monthly/yearly budget continues to increase at an alarming rate. As a simple exercise, I've been tracking all of my expenses for the past year and a half. My household food expenses were averaging somewhere around 200 dollars per month about 1.5 years ago. However, now, the average is often closer to 325 per month. This means that there is a significant increase in the price of food. This is about a 35% increase.

Thankfully, food is not the big expense in my budget, but it is getting to be that way. If it continues to creep up at this level, by the end of 2008 I will have a monthly food budget of about 440 dollars per month.

Unfortunately, I have not been tracking gas expenses, but those too have been creeping up. And my monthly commuter pass went up by 50 dollars per month as well. That is a 600 dollar per year increase.

The reason that these reports really burn my toast is that 2.2% is no where near the amount of real increase in regards to overall inflation. Property taxes and services all continue to increase in price as well. In the end, household monthly expenses are increasing at a rate of about 5% each year. As debt continues to be paid off, this is a manageable number, but once debt is completely paid and money can no longer be "saved" by paying off debt and eliminating interest payments, these increases will become problematic.

Planning for Retirement
The idea that real, average-joe inflation is 2.2% is a bunch of hot air if you ask me. So I have no intention of using that figure. Instead I reworking my plans towards planning on 4 to 5% of real average-joe inflation because 2.2 or even 3% is dramatically under estimating it, in my opinion. And although it doesn't seem like that much, toward the end of a 20 year retirement, those 1 or 1.5% differences will make a big difference. I worry about people that think they can get away with a 2 or 3% increase. I think that is overly optimistic.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Amen. I don't think the inflation rate adequately reflects some key price increases - housing, gas heat, gas for your car, etc. Even tomatoes went way up due to some problems with the California crops. Taking a broad measure of the costs doesn't really reflect what 'average Joe' has to pay. And forget about taxes. Here in Jersey I would do backflips if we capped tax increases out at 2.2% per year...
Anonymous said…
I fear the change in the way we define "inflation" had more to do with capping Social Security increases (which are tied to inflation) than anything else.

I work for a state university. We just received a 4% cost of living adjustment (in many recent years we've received nothing). Unfortunately, my property taxes are up about 8%, health insurance deductibles went up 30%, premiums went up 11%. Groceries are climbing fast as well. My cost of living is going up WAY faster than the "core rate".

Heck, even my BARBER is going to raise his prices next month because his rent goes up 6% annually.

Like you, I expect to be OK due to rapidly declining debt levels (plus I've started a business on the side that is moving towards profitability). Still, the "official" numbers are not what my budget tracking reveals.

Popular posts from this blog

On Buying a Lifestyle...with a Fixed-Rate Mortgage

Despite all of the back and forth about sub-prime mortgages and the housing bubble, I am feeling just fine. The reason is that when purchasing, I followed some old advice: Don't expect to flip. In general, I've been told by many people that you shouldn't buy a home unless you plan to hold on to it for 7 years or longer. If the market does well and you decide to sell, fine. But if you want to be sure not to lose money, don't buy something that you only want for a year or two. I've been in my current location for more than 3 years. I like it. And I have no intention of leaving in the short or medium term. It seems to me, that real estate, like any asset class, has its ups and downs. But as a practical point, I don't look at my home as an asset per se. Rather, I consider it to be a fixed expense that I need to survive, much like food and water. Therefore, as long as the payment is reasonable and it functions to keep me warm and sheltered and comfortable, that is a...

Do Better With Your Time

Recently, I've been extremely busy with some work commitments. The interesting thing for me is that this increased work activity has really helped crystallize some of my feelings with regard to time. And these ideas are a critical part about my view on personal finance. I'm curious to know if others feel similarly. Time is money. That is, Time, in some way, contains energy. Money, is also energy. In the act of working, I am able to compound and increase the amount of money that I have. I am exchanging my time and effort and thought which are components of my work, for the productivity that I produce. And this production gets me money from my employer. However, the first dollars that I make each day, week, or month are the most valuable. Then the ones that I make at the end are the most valuable. (Forget about taxes for a minute.) The reason is, the first ones help me have a place to live and food to eat. And the last ones are the ones that I can use to really improve my life lo...

Blogging WealthTrack: Christine Benz (Retire Early? Or not?)

 This morning I've watched an interesting video on Consuelo Mack: WealthTrack. Here, Consuelo's guest, a longtime contributor, Christine Benz, a personal finance expert from Morningstar joined Consuelo for a discussion on issues related to retirement, in particular in the current market environments. This conversation is even more interesting against the backdrop of The Great Resignation. I found Christine's advice to be particularly interesting on a couple of fronts. Her advice in dealing with talking about retirement in general, in particular for people who are in the process of thinking about retiring early gave me pause. She is considering the traditional advice of a 4 percent withdrawal rate to be dangerous and indeed, actually concerning. According to the recent research she cites, a 3% withdrawal rate is a better option. Even more than the four percent rule, I think that her comments on annuities are particularly interesting. While annuities have been given a bad nam...