Skip to main content

Retirement Question from NCN

Since this question was asked over at No Credit Needed, I figured I'd take a crack at it. Please note, I am not a financial advisor and I don't play one on T.V. -- any advice/ideas that are presented here is solely the opinion of the author. Please do your own research/consult your own accountant/financial adviser before making any decisions based on this information.

NCN asks: "Should I invest my retirement funds in ETFs, Mutual Funds, Bonds, or Individual Stocks? Depending on your answer, what should the proper "mix" be?"

In general, I would rule out Individual Stocks for a retirement fund. Retirement funds in general are long-term. And most of the time, if you are getting a stock, it is because you are thinking it will go up over the short or medium term. So buying individual stocks seems a little wierd to me for retirement planning.

So, that limits it back to ETFs, Mutual Funds, and Bonds. Again, I would avoid individual bonds and instead focus on a bond fund or ETF that represents a basket of bonds for the sake of diversification.

When it comes to picking Mutual Funds or ETFs, it would depend on the retirement vehicle I was using and my investment style. If you do a 401k, 403b, it is likely that some sort of low cost mutual fund is the best option for you if you are concerned with growth with low fees. If you are investing in large chunks once or twice or three times per year, I'd go with a low cost ETF. Funds and ETFs are available for both stocks and bonds.

Picking the right mix is a question of how much money you have and how much you plan to invest in the future and how long you intend to leave the money alone before retiring.

If you are in your 20s or 30s, you likely have at least 30 years until retirement and you are probably going to want to do somewhere about 80% stocks and 20% bonds. In your forties and fifties, it might be more like 70/30 and then 60/40 when you are in your sixties. All of these numbers are rough and can be adjusted slightly depending on risk tolerance.

In addition to having the right mix of stocks/bonds, it might make sense to consider other types of diversification. Other investments like REITs or treasuries or metals might be nice investments for small portions of your portfolio (if you have a large retirement account). And don't forget to make sure that your investing is split up among different types of bonds and stocks.

You don't want to put 100% of your stock/mutual fund portion into a single mutual fund that invests in small cap, for example. This might make your retirement fund way too volitile and risky. Instead split it up somewhat between funds that handle small, mid, and large cap as well as international/emerging markets. If that sounds too confusing, you might consider an ETF or Fund like VTI by vanguard which is an ETF/Mutual fund that automatically diversifies the amount of money invested among the entire stock market. This doesn't deal with the emerging market/international issue much, but beats having to dissect the funds yourself if it is not your favorite thing to do.

Anyway, those are my off the cuff thoughts. Hope it helps.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Buying a Lifestyle...with a Fixed-Rate Mortgage

Despite all of the back and forth about sub-prime mortgages and the housing bubble, I am feeling just fine. The reason is that when purchasing, I followed some old advice: Don't expect to flip. In general, I've been told by many people that you shouldn't buy a home unless you plan to hold on to it for 7 years or longer. If the market does well and you decide to sell, fine. But if you want to be sure not to lose money, don't buy something that you only want for a year or two. I've been in my current location for more than 3 years. I like it. And I have no intention of leaving in the short or medium term. It seems to me, that real estate, like any asset class, has its ups and downs. But as a practical point, I don't look at my home as an asset per se. Rather, I consider it to be a fixed expense that I need to survive, much like food and water. Therefore, as long as the payment is reasonable and it functions to keep me warm and sheltered and comfortable, that is a...

Do Better With Your Time

Recently, I've been extremely busy with some work commitments. The interesting thing for me is that this increased work activity has really helped crystallize some of my feelings with regard to time. And these ideas are a critical part about my view on personal finance. I'm curious to know if others feel similarly. Time is money. That is, Time, in some way, contains energy. Money, is also energy. In the act of working, I am able to compound and increase the amount of money that I have. I am exchanging my time and effort and thought which are components of my work, for the productivity that I produce. And this production gets me money from my employer. However, the first dollars that I make each day, week, or month are the most valuable. Then the ones that I make at the end are the most valuable. (Forget about taxes for a minute.) The reason is, the first ones help me have a place to live and food to eat. And the last ones are the ones that I can use to really improve my life lo...

Blogging WealthTrack: Christine Benz (Retire Early? Or not?)

 This morning I've watched an interesting video on Consuelo Mack: WealthTrack. Here, Consuelo's guest, a longtime contributor, Christine Benz, a personal finance expert from Morningstar joined Consuelo for a discussion on issues related to retirement, in particular in the current market environments. This conversation is even more interesting against the backdrop of The Great Resignation. I found Christine's advice to be particularly interesting on a couple of fronts. Her advice in dealing with talking about retirement in general, in particular for people who are in the process of thinking about retiring early gave me pause. She is considering the traditional advice of a 4 percent withdrawal rate to be dangerous and indeed, actually concerning. According to the recent research she cites, a 3% withdrawal rate is a better option. Even more than the four percent rule, I think that her comments on annuities are particularly interesting. While annuities have been given a bad nam...