Skip to main content

Budgets with Semi-Monthly Pay

I remember when I used to work at a job where I was paid bi-weekly instead of semi-monthly. For those of you who are not payroll nerds like I am, bi-weekly is when you are paid every other week. Semi-monthly means you are paid twice per month. People generally think of them the same way, but they aren't. The semi-monthly people are the ones who get the short end of the stick, in my opinion.

If you are paid semi monthly, most often it is on the (1st and 15th) or the (15th and last day of the month). This means that you need to make your money last for that period of fifteen days and cover all of the bills for the next period with that paycheck. Personally, I've found that the best way to do this is using excel.

Setup a spreadsheet in excel (or any other spreadsheet application) with a column for the title of your bill.
The next column will be for the date your bill is due each month.
The third column is how much the bill is for. Obviously, this is just an estimate since you are going to see different amounts on utility bills etc, but it gets the job done.

When the first comes and you get paid, just add up all of the bills that you need to pay before the fifteenth. Subtract that from your total, and write out the bills (assuming you are above zero!). Then what you have left is your extra.

If you find that you have too many bills due in the beginning or end of the month, call your creditors and ask for a change in due-date. They will usually oblige. Since your checks are coming in evenly, its usually best if your bills come in evenly as well.

Comments

Unknown said…
I don't understand. How does getting paid every two weeks (at random days of the month) help you out?

If my bills are:
Mortgage - 1st.
Credit Card - 7th.
Electricity - 17th.
Car Loan - 20th.

Then I know that the 1st paycheck always pays the Mortgage and the Credit card, The 2nd the Electricity and the Car Loan.

Getting paid biweekly means that the paycheck might land on the 3rd instead of the 31st, or on the 10th. And then on some months you get three paychecks (which I guess forces you to save money)

Anyway I don't see how semi-monthly is the short end of the stick.
EasyChange said…
That extra third paycheck is why I think that it is better. Essentially, on a bi-weekly schedule, you budget to handle your bills monthly (at least I did).

So, if you make 1000 per check and have 1400 in bills, you would know that you have an extra 300 per check left over. This means that you can budget yourself more consistently. You know how much driving you will be doing every week - it is generally constant. So is the number of lunches and other expenses. In the end, you have it easier when it comes to budgets. And on months that you get the 3rd paycheck, it is a windfall.

When you look at semi-monthly paychecks, it is tougher. You might have really anywhere from 14-16 days between paychecks depending on how the holidays and such fall. As a result, you have more variance in your spending and its harder to make the money last. Furthermore, there is never a "windfall" built in because the number of checks and amount for each check is generally the same (unless you can do overtime).

So obviously, the net amount you get is the same each year regardless of how often you're paid, but from a budget standpoint, I find bi-weekly to be better. I hope that explains it.

Popular posts from this blog

On Buying a Lifestyle...with a Fixed-Rate Mortgage

Despite all of the back and forth about sub-prime mortgages and the housing bubble, I am feeling just fine. The reason is that when purchasing, I followed some old advice: Don't expect to flip. In general, I've been told by many people that you shouldn't buy a home unless you plan to hold on to it for 7 years or longer. If the market does well and you decide to sell, fine. But if you want to be sure not to lose money, don't buy something that you only want for a year or two. I've been in my current location for more than 3 years. I like it. And I have no intention of leaving in the short or medium term. It seems to me, that real estate, like any asset class, has its ups and downs. But as a practical point, I don't look at my home as an asset per se. Rather, I consider it to be a fixed expense that I need to survive, much like food and water. Therefore, as long as the payment is reasonable and it functions to keep me warm and sheltered and comfortable, that is a...

Do Better With Your Time

Recently, I've been extremely busy with some work commitments. The interesting thing for me is that this increased work activity has really helped crystallize some of my feelings with regard to time. And these ideas are a critical part about my view on personal finance. I'm curious to know if others feel similarly. Time is money. That is, Time, in some way, contains energy. Money, is also energy. In the act of working, I am able to compound and increase the amount of money that I have. I am exchanging my time and effort and thought which are components of my work, for the productivity that I produce. And this production gets me money from my employer. However, the first dollars that I make each day, week, or month are the most valuable. Then the ones that I make at the end are the most valuable. (Forget about taxes for a minute.) The reason is, the first ones help me have a place to live and food to eat. And the last ones are the ones that I can use to really improve my life lo...

Blogging WealthTrack: Christine Benz (Retire Early? Or not?)

 This morning I've watched an interesting video on Consuelo Mack: WealthTrack. Here, Consuelo's guest, a longtime contributor, Christine Benz, a personal finance expert from Morningstar joined Consuelo for a discussion on issues related to retirement, in particular in the current market environments. This conversation is even more interesting against the backdrop of The Great Resignation. I found Christine's advice to be particularly interesting on a couple of fronts. Her advice in dealing with talking about retirement in general, in particular for people who are in the process of thinking about retiring early gave me pause. She is considering the traditional advice of a 4 percent withdrawal rate to be dangerous and indeed, actually concerning. According to the recent research she cites, a 3% withdrawal rate is a better option. Even more than the four percent rule, I think that her comments on annuities are particularly interesting. While annuities have been given a bad nam...