Skip to main content

Live Long, but what about Prosper?

One of the more interesting developments in the world of personal finance has been Prosper. Prosper has done right by me so far. So I figure that I would talk about my small experiences related to prosper. I'm just your average pf blogger who learned about prosper and thought it would be a good idea. When I went to college, there were tons of places that advertised payday loans and such and I always got a little peeved at the idea of predatory lending. Don't even get me started about this whole sub prime mortgage mess. But now that I've been using it for several months, I thought I'd provide an update:

Right now I have about 300 bucks in prosper loans. Each loan is 50 bucks a piece. I slowly am filtering in some of my side income into these loans. And overall these loans are earning an average of 13 percent each. Surely it's not big money, especially when compared with possible long-term returns of the stock market or of the safer returns of a high-interest savings account or money market fund. But I still think that prosper has its place. It is a nice way to diversify your portfolio (albeit just a little bit).

1. TIME - If you're in it to make money for small amounts of time invested, prosper might not be the best thing though. I personally try to read each loan and related endorsements and comments before bidding -- even for a 50 dollar loan. I like the personal touch and I am ok with spending the time. But it certainly isn't very efficient. You might have another strategy, but this has worked for me so far.

2. RATING - I don't bid on anything below a C-level. Too risky, enough said.

3. FUNDING - If the loan doesn't already have a significant amount of funding, I won't bid. I bid to undercut on a juicy rate. That is the beauty of the auction process. And I often can steal 50 bucks of a nice juicy loan from someone because they aren't paying attention.

4. SELF PERPETUATING - My goal in the next year or two is to make enough money each month so that I can self fund new loans using only interest from existing loans. To that end I generally wait a month or two between each new loan and deposit only a small amount of money to add to the existing interest to make my next chunk of 50 bucks. This makes me comfortable that I am not putting too much of my money at risk. The build up is slow this way, but since I am not really "counting" on it, its fine with me.

Overall, this probably doesn't make prosper a worthy investment for tons of money. Unless you are like "pensioner", the guy who can afford to dump literally hundreds of thousands of dollars into prosper, it really doesn't matter. Prosper is really nice, and its a fun little investing 'hobby' but I don't think I will be getting rich off of it anytime soon. But it beats earning nothing on my money, and if it helps people avoid payday loans and other predatory lending, so much the better.

Comments

BudgetBoy said…
I used to agree with "don't bid on anything below C level", but that was changed when a B borrower defaulted by a bankrupcy. Now I am really starting to wonder if I should keep throwing money in there.
Joylie said…
I enjoyed reading your blog post about Prosper.com.

Just today, I listened to a podcast interview of the founder of Prosper.com. The interview was conducted by Standford University Business students who have a website called "Iinnovatecast.com." You can subscribe to their podcast at iTunes. All their podcasts are very interesting interviews with top innovators such as the CEO of Google, Craigslist, Intel, etc.

By the way, my son told me a while back that he had some money "loaned" to Prosper. I am going to have to ask him how it's going for him.

My website address is:
http://joyfulbiz.blogspot.com/

Popular posts from this blog

On Buying a Lifestyle...with a Fixed-Rate Mortgage

Despite all of the back and forth about sub-prime mortgages and the housing bubble, I am feeling just fine. The reason is that when purchasing, I followed some old advice: Don't expect to flip. In general, I've been told by many people that you shouldn't buy a home unless you plan to hold on to it for 7 years or longer. If the market does well and you decide to sell, fine. But if you want to be sure not to lose money, don't buy something that you only want for a year or two. I've been in my current location for more than 3 years. I like it. And I have no intention of leaving in the short or medium term. It seems to me, that real estate, like any asset class, has its ups and downs. But as a practical point, I don't look at my home as an asset per se. Rather, I consider it to be a fixed expense that I need to survive, much like food and water. Therefore, as long as the payment is reasonable and it functions to keep me warm and sheltered and comfortable, that is a...

Do Better With Your Time

Recently, I've been extremely busy with some work commitments. The interesting thing for me is that this increased work activity has really helped crystallize some of my feelings with regard to time. And these ideas are a critical part about my view on personal finance. I'm curious to know if others feel similarly. Time is money. That is, Time, in some way, contains energy. Money, is also energy. In the act of working, I am able to compound and increase the amount of money that I have. I am exchanging my time and effort and thought which are components of my work, for the productivity that I produce. And this production gets me money from my employer. However, the first dollars that I make each day, week, or month are the most valuable. Then the ones that I make at the end are the most valuable. (Forget about taxes for a minute.) The reason is, the first ones help me have a place to live and food to eat. And the last ones are the ones that I can use to really improve my life lo...

Blogging WealthTrack: Christine Benz (Retire Early? Or not?)

 This morning I've watched an interesting video on Consuelo Mack: WealthTrack. Here, Consuelo's guest, a longtime contributor, Christine Benz, a personal finance expert from Morningstar joined Consuelo for a discussion on issues related to retirement, in particular in the current market environments. This conversation is even more interesting against the backdrop of The Great Resignation. I found Christine's advice to be particularly interesting on a couple of fronts. Her advice in dealing with talking about retirement in general, in particular for people who are in the process of thinking about retiring early gave me pause. She is considering the traditional advice of a 4 percent withdrawal rate to be dangerous and indeed, actually concerning. According to the recent research she cites, a 3% withdrawal rate is a better option. Even more than the four percent rule, I think that her comments on annuities are particularly interesting. While annuities have been given a bad nam...