Skip to main content

What Happened to the Emergency Fund?

One of the first things that I learned about personal finance from my grandfather is to have an emergency fund of six months worth of expenses. This still seems absurd to me in this day and age and given my income to debt ratio. Even though I think an emergency fund cannot be underestimated, according to a Federal Reserve survey, 8% less people even have savings accounts since 2001. The savings mentality is drifting away. Instead large percentages of people's net worth is in retirement accounts.

This is a key mistake for most people. They confuse 401k loans and home equity lines of credit with emergency funds. In my opinion, neither 401ks or home equity should be touched until you are approaching retirement. Instead, a separate account (either savings or money market) should be set up and used for emergencies.

That is the perfect self-insurance plan. It is for just what it sounds like - emergencies. Working at my first job out of college was great, but there were lay offs. Luckily I was not one of those who lost their job, but it made me realize that anything can happen. Even if you are smart and talented you can still lose your job, get into an accident or have some other emergency really throw you for a loop.

Even still, I think that 6 months is too much for most people, but 3 months is reasonable. Together my partner and I have been saving for several years now and the fund is still not quite there. Some of it was depleted recently to pay off a credit card that will save me several hundred dollars in interest over the next year.

Even small amounts contributed regularly (right after payday but before bills) is best. These will add up over time and make sure that once it is a sizeable amount that you get it into a high-yield account so that you will get substantial interest.


Source: http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/bulletin/2006/financesurvey.pdf

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Buying a Lifestyle...with a Fixed-Rate Mortgage

Despite all of the back and forth about sub-prime mortgages and the housing bubble, I am feeling just fine. The reason is that when purchasing, I followed some old advice: Don't expect to flip. In general, I've been told by many people that you shouldn't buy a home unless you plan to hold on to it for 7 years or longer. If the market does well and you decide to sell, fine. But if you want to be sure not to lose money, don't buy something that you only want for a year or two. I've been in my current location for more than 3 years. I like it. And I have no intention of leaving in the short or medium term. It seems to me, that real estate, like any asset class, has its ups and downs. But as a practical point, I don't look at my home as an asset per se. Rather, I consider it to be a fixed expense that I need to survive, much like food and water. Therefore, as long as the payment is reasonable and it functions to keep me warm and sheltered and comfortable, that is a...

Do Better With Your Time

Recently, I've been extremely busy with some work commitments. The interesting thing for me is that this increased work activity has really helped crystallize some of my feelings with regard to time. And these ideas are a critical part about my view on personal finance. I'm curious to know if others feel similarly. Time is money. That is, Time, in some way, contains energy. Money, is also energy. In the act of working, I am able to compound and increase the amount of money that I have. I am exchanging my time and effort and thought which are components of my work, for the productivity that I produce. And this production gets me money from my employer. However, the first dollars that I make each day, week, or month are the most valuable. Then the ones that I make at the end are the most valuable. (Forget about taxes for a minute.) The reason is, the first ones help me have a place to live and food to eat. And the last ones are the ones that I can use to really improve my life lo...

Blogging WealthTrack: Christine Benz (Retire Early? Or not?)

 This morning I've watched an interesting video on Consuelo Mack: WealthTrack. Here, Consuelo's guest, a longtime contributor, Christine Benz, a personal finance expert from Morningstar joined Consuelo for a discussion on issues related to retirement, in particular in the current market environments. This conversation is even more interesting against the backdrop of The Great Resignation. I found Christine's advice to be particularly interesting on a couple of fronts. Her advice in dealing with talking about retirement in general, in particular for people who are in the process of thinking about retiring early gave me pause. She is considering the traditional advice of a 4 percent withdrawal rate to be dangerous and indeed, actually concerning. According to the recent research she cites, a 3% withdrawal rate is a better option. Even more than the four percent rule, I think that her comments on annuities are particularly interesting. While annuities have been given a bad nam...